• Home
  • Listen Live!
  • Contests
    • Salute to Service
  • News
  • Sports
  • Events
  • On-Air
    • Dave Ramsey
    • FOX News Rundown
    • Glenn Beck
    • Bill O’Reilly
    • The Dana Show
    • Hugh Hewitt
    • Joe Pags
    • America At Night
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
MENU
  • Home
  • Listen Live!
  • Contests
    • Salute to Service
  • News
  • Sports
  • Events
  • On-Air
    • Dave Ramsey
    • FOX News Rundown
    • Glenn Beck
    • Bill O’Reilly
    • The Dana Show
    • Hugh Hewitt
    • Joe Pags
    • America At Night
  • Careers
  • Contact Us

Supreme Court to hear arguments over Trump bid to limit birthright citizenship

April 18, 2025 Staff
  • News Daypop
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Reddit
  • Pocket
  • LinkedIn
Greek classical architecture of the United States Supreme Court building with sunrise in background.

The Supreme Court announced Thursday that it will hold oral arguments next month to consider whether the Trump administration can partially implement an executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship.

The birthright citizenship order seeks to limit automatic citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents who are citizens or lawful permanent residents. Specifically, it excludes children born to undocumented mothers, those in the U.S. temporarily, or children whose fathers lack legal status or citizenship. Under the directive, federal agencies were instructed to stop recognizing U.S. citizenship for children born after February 19.

The high court scheduled the hearing for May 15 at 10 a.m., to hear the Justice Department’s request for emergency relief. These injunctions have so far prevented the federal government from implementing a new framework that would deny automatic citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents without permanent legal status.

The administration is asking the Court to scale back three federal injunctions that currently prevent enforcement of President Trump’s order across the country.  If the Supreme Court grants the request, the administration would only be restricted from applying the executive order to a limited group: the individual plaintiffs, certain immigrant advocacy groups, and residents of 22 states.

The acting solicitor general wrote in the application to the Court “enough is enough,” urging the justices to limit the injunctions to the individual plaintiffs and specific group members involved in the case: “At the very least,” she added, “the Court should permit federal agencies to prepare and issue public guidance on the new policy.”

Opponents of the order have urged the Supreme Court to maintain the lower court rulings. Officials from 18 states, along with Washington, D.C., and San Francisco, argued in court filings that the administration’s request would effectively strip citizenship from potentially hundreds of thousands of children born in the U.S.

Editorial credit: creativetan / Shutterstock.com

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Previous Story
ESPN ‘College GameDay’ analyst Lee Corso to retire in August
Next Story
Suspect in custody after mass shooting at Florida State University leaves two dead, six hospitalized

Facebook

KAPE Radio 95.7 FM News Talk

Local Forecast

CAPE GIRARDEAU WEATHER

Menu

  • Listen Live
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contest Rules
  • KAPE-AM Public File
  • KAPE-AM FCC Applications
  • EEO Report
© 2025 KAPE - Cape Girardeau, MO Powered by OneCMS™ | Served by InterTech Media LLC
Are you still listening?

Thanks for Listening to KAPE - Cape Girardeau, MO! Please register to continue listening. Thank you!

59141636
Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
8f9d4886285b6c8ac840c6b8322c363d90ff84af
1
Loading...